Classification Criteria for Herpes Simplex Virus Anterior Uveitis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine classification criteria for herpes simplex virus (HSV) anterior uveitis DESIGN: Machine learning of cases with HSV anterior uveitis and 8 other anterior uveitides. METHODS: Cases of anterior uveitides were collected in an informatics-designed preliminary database, and a final database was constructed of cases achieving supermajority agreement on the diagnosis, using formal consensus techniques. Cases were split into a training set and a validation set. Machine learning using multinomial logistic regression was used in the training set to determine a parsimonious set of criteria that minimized the misclassification rate among the anterior uveitides. The resulting criteria were evaluated in the validation set. RESULTS: A total of 1,083 cases of anterior uveitides, including 101 cases of HSV anterior uveitis, were evaluated by machine learning. The overall accuracy for anterior uveitides was 97.5% in the training set and 96.7% in the validation set (95% confidence interval: 92.4-98.6). Key criteria for HSV anterior uveitis included unilateral anterior uveitis with either 1) positive aqueous humor polymerase chain reaction assay for HSV; 2) sectoral iris atrophy in a patient ≤50 years old; or 3) HSV keratitis. The misclassification rates for HSV anterior uveitis were 8.3% in the training set and 17% in the validation set. CONCLUSIONS: The criteria for HSV anterior uveitis had a reasonably low misclassification rate and appeared to perform well enough for use in clinical and translational research.

Classification Criteria for Varicella Zoster Virus Anterior Uveitis.

PURPOSE: To determine classification criteria for varicella zoster virus (VZV) anterior uveitis. DESIGN: Machine learning of cases with VZV anterior uveitis and 8 other anterior uveitides. METHODS: Cases of anterior uveitides were collected in an informatics-designed preliminary database, and a final database was constructed of cases achieving supermajority agreement on the diagnosis, using formal consensus techniques. Cases were split into a training set and a validation set. Machine learning using multinomial logistic regression was used on the training set to determine a parsimonious set of criteria that minimized the misclassification rate among the anterior uveitides. The resulting criteria were evaluated on the validation set. RESULTS: One thousand eighty-three cases of anterior uveitides, including 123 cases of VZV anterior uveitis, were evaluated by machine learning. The overall accuracy for anterior uveitides was 97.5% in the training set and 96.7% in the validation set (95% confidence interval 92.4, 98.6). Key criteria for VZV anterior uveitis included unilateral anterior uveitis with either (1) positive aqueous humor polymerase chain reaction assay for VZV; (2) sectoral iris atrophy in a patient ≥60 years of age; or (3) concurrent or recent dermatomal herpes zoster. The misclassification rates for VZV anterior uveitis were 0.9% in the training set and 0% in the validation set, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The criteria for VZV anterior uveitis had a low misclassification rate and seemed to perform sufficiently well for use in clinical and translational research.

Classification Criteria for Cytomegalovirus Retinitis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine classification criteria for cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis. DESIGN: Machine learning of cases with CMV retinitis and 4 other infectious posterior/ panuveitides. METHODS: Cases of infectious posterior/panuveitides were collected in an informatics-designed preliminary database, and a final database was constructed of cases achieving supermajority agreement on diagnosis using formal consensus techniques. Cases were split into a training set and a validation set. Machine learning using multinomial logistic regression was used in the training set to determine a parsimonious set of criteria that minimized the misclassification rate among the infectious posterior/panuveitides. The resulting criteria were evaluated in the validation set. RESULTS: A total of 803 cases of infectious posterior/panuveitides, including 211 cases of CMV retinitis, were evaluated by machine learning. Key criteria for CMV retinitis included: 1) necrotizing retinitis with indistinct borders due to numerous small satellites; 2) evidence of immune compromise; and either 3) a characteristic clinical appearance, or 4) positive polymerase chain reaction assay results for CMV from an intraocular specimen. Characteristic appearances for CMV retinitis included: 1) wedge-shaped area of retinitis; 2) hemorrhagic retinitis; or 3) granular retinitis. Overall accuracy for infectious posterior/panuveitides was 92.1% in the training set and 93.3% (95% confidence interval: 88.2-96.3) in the validation set. The misclassification rates for CMV retinitis were 6.9% in the training set and 6.3% in the validation set. CONCLUSIONS: The criteria for CMV retinitis had a low misclassification rate and appeared to perform sufficiently well for use in clinical and translational research.

Classification Criteria for Cytomegalovirus Anterior Uveitis.

PURPOSE: To determine classification criteria for cytomegalovirus (CMV) anterior uveitis. DESIGN: Machine learning of cases with CMV anterior uveitis and 8 other anterior uveitides. METHODS: Cases of anterior uveitides were collected in an informatics-designed preliminary database, and a final database was constructed of cases achieving supermajority agreement on the diagnosis, using formal consensus techniques. Cases were split into a training set and a validation set. Machine learning using multinomial logistic regression was used on the training set to determine a parsimonious set of criteria that minimized the misclassification rate among the anterior uveitides. The resulting criteria were evaluated on the validation set. RESULTS: One thousand eighty-three cases of anterior uveitides, including 89 cases of CMV anterior uveitis, were evaluated by machine learning. The overall accuracy for anterior uveitides was 97.5% in the training set and 96.7% in the validation set (95% confidence interval 92.4, 98.6). Key criteria for CMV anterior uveitis included unilateral anterior uveitis with a positive aqueous humor polymerase chain reaction assay for CMV. No clinical features reliably diagnosed CMV anterior uveitis. The misclassification rates for CMV anterior uveitis were 1.3% in the training set and 0% in the validation set. CONCLUSIONS: The criteria for CMV anterior uveitis had a low misclassification rate and seemed to perform sufficiently well for use in clinical and translational research.

Adoption of Innovation in Herpes Simplex Virus Keratitis.

Herpes simplex keratitis, caused primarily by human herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), remains the most common infectious cause of unilateral blindness and vision impairment in the industrialized world. Major advances in the care of HSV keratitis have been driven in large part by the landmark Herpetic Eye Disease Study randomized clinical trials, which were among the first in ophthalmology to reflect emerging trial conventions, including multicenter subject enrollment, double-masking, placebo controls, and a priori sample size determinations. The results of these trials now form much of the evidence basis for the management of this disease. However, management patterns in clinical practice often deviate from evidence-based care. These perceived quality gaps have given rise to the evolving field of implementation science, which is concerned with the methods of promoting the application of evidence-based medicine within routine care. To overcome variations in the quality and consistency of care for HSV keratitis, a range of clinical- and technology-based innovations are proposed. The most pressing needs include the following: a rational and tractable disease classification scheme that provides an immediate link between the anatomical localization of disease (corneal epithelial, stromal, or endothelial) and the appropriate treatment, and the actualization of an electronic medical record system capable of providing evidence-based treatment algorithms at relevant points of care. The latter would also input data to population-wide disease registries to identify implementation-rich targets for quality improvement, education, and research. These innovations may allow us to reduce the human and economic burdens of this highly morbid, and often blinding, disease.

Clinical features and presentation of infectious scleritis from herpes viruses: a report of 35 cases.

PURPOSE: To describe clinical features and presentation of infectious scleritis resulting from herpes viruses. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-five patients out of 500 with scleritis. METHODS: We reviewed the electronic health records of 500 patients with scleritis, 35 of whom were diagnosed with herpes virus infection, seen at 2 tertiary referral centers. We studied the clinical features and ocular complications of this subset of patient with scleritis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation between classification, severity, and symptoms (i.e., pain) and diagnosis of herpetic-associated scleritis. Vision loss, presence of associated uveitis, keratitis, glaucoma, or systemic disease were documented over the follow-up period. Other outcome measures included epidemiologic data: age, gender, laterality, visual acuity, duration of symptoms, and underlying systemic or ocular diseases. RESULTS: Of 500 patients with scleritis, 47 (9.4%) had an underlying infectious cause. Thirty-five (74.4%) of these were diagnosed with herpes virus infection, 5 (10.6%) with tuberculosis, and the remaining 7 (14.8%) with other infectious disease. Patients with herpes-associated scleritis were analyzed as a group and then compared with those with idiopathic scleritis. Most patients with herpetic scleritis presented with acute (85.7%) and unilateral (80%) scleral inflammation. Pain was moderate or severe in 68.6% of the patients. The most common type of scleritis was diffuse anterior in 80% (n = 28), followed by nodular anterior 11.4% (n = 4), and necrotizing in 8.6% (n = 3). Necrotizing anterior scleritis was more commonly seen in patients with herpetic scleritis versus patients with idiopathic disease (8.6% vs 1.2%; P<0.05). Unilaterality was also more common in herpetic scleritis (80%) than in idiopathic disease (56.7%; P<0.05). Vision loss was significantly greater in herpetic than idiopathic scleritis (34.3% vs 11.5%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The association between scleritis and infectious disease may be higher than previously reported by other series. Herpes viruses account for 7% of all scleritis cases and its diagnosis may be challenging when there is not a classically diagnostic clinical picture. We present the observed clinical features of herpetic scleritis and describe the clinical differences at presentation between patients with idiopathic scleritis and those with herpes infection.

The effect of clinical severity and eyelid rash on ocular involvement in primary varicella infection.

PURPOSE: To describe ocular manifestations in primary varicella infection and their relationship to systemic severity and the associated eyelid rash. METHODS: One hundred consecutive children with primary varicella were examined prospectively. The cases were classified as mild, moderate, and severe according to the severity of clinical presentation. Excluding the presence of eyelid rash, children with ocular findings were assigned to group 1 (G1), and those without ocular findings were assigned to group 2 (G2). Patients in G1 were also evaluated according to the nature of ocular manifestations and the course of uveitis. RESULTS: Twenty-one percent of patients had ocular involvement (G1) and 79% had no ocular involvement (G2). While chickenpox had a mild course in 85.7% of patients in G1 and 88.6% of patients in G2, all others had a moderate course. None of the children had a severe course. A varicella eyelid rash was present in 28.6% of patients in G1 and 13.9% in G2. Among ocular findings, 38.1% of patients had conjunctivitis, 57.1% had anterior uveitis, and 4.8% had disciform keratouveitis. There was no significant association between severity of chickenpox and severity of ocular involvement (p=0.712). There was also no relationship between eyelid rash and ocular involvement (p=0.787). CONCLUSIONS: There is neither an association between the severity of chickenpox and the severity of ocular involvement nor an association between the presence of a varicella eyelid rash and the development of uveitis. As the prognosis regarding sequelae of ocular involvement in varicella infection is good, only those patients with ocular signs and symptoms need be referred by pediatricians for an ophthalmologic examination.

Ocular findings in patients with Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever.

PURPOSE: To describe ocular findings of patients with Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF). DESIGN: Prospective, interventional, consecutive case series. METHODS: This study was conducted in Sivas, a city located in the central Anatolia, between July 1 and August 31, 2007. Confirmed CCHF patients were enrolled in the study and underwent ocular examination during hospitalization. RESULTS: Nineteen confirmed CCHF patients were included in this study. All patients were classified into 2 groups in terms of disease severity (severe vs nonsevere), according to the Swanepoel predictive criteria. Fourteen patients (73.7%) were classified as "nonsevere," and the remaining 5 patients (26.3%) were classified as "severe" in this study. One patient having severe disease died. Ocular findings were present in 14 patients (73.7%) and none of the patients presented any visual complaints. Ocular examination revealed that 7 patients (36.8%) had only bilateral multiple subconjunctival hemorrhage, and 2 patients (10.5%) (1 bilateral, 1 unilateral) had retinal hemorrhage. Five patients (26.3%) had subconjunctival hemorrhage and retinal hemorrhage. Follow-up examination 1 month later showed complete resorption of the subconjunctival hemorrhage and retinal hemorrhage. There was a statistically significant difference between patients with ocular findings and patients without ocular findings for prothrombin time (P = .011). There was no evidence of uveitis, retinal edema, sheathing of retinal vessels, or intravitreal hemorrhage in our patients. CONCLUSION: From the small sample study, CCHF caused a mild form of ocular disease. CCHF must be considered when subconjunctival or superficial retinal hemorrhages are seen in association with fever in endemic areas.

[Necrotic herpetic retinitis]. / Rétinites nécrosantes herpétiques.

The diagnosis of necrotic herpetic retinitis is suggested on clinical grounds, prompting urgent appropriate intravenous and intravitreal treatment. PCR on ocular samples is most often successful in identifying the herpetic agent. Classic acute retinal necrosis syndrome caused by herpes simplex or zoster virus and the different clinical forms present in immunocompetent or immunodepressed patients are described. The differential diagnosis includes atypical presentation of retinal necrosis caused by toxoplasmosis, syphilis, or ocular lymphoma; the ocular samples are useful in establishing the etiological diagnosis. We describe the different therapeutic strategies in the acute phase and as secondary prophylactic treatment. The clinical outcome appears to be influenced by rapid, appropriate treatment, limiting the extension of the retinal necrosis.

Severe visual loss related to isolated peripapillary retinal and optic nerve head cytomegalovirus infection.

We examined ten patients from a consecutive series of 73 patients with either isolated cytomegalovirus papillitis or limited cytomegalovirus retinitis contiguous with the optic disk. Patients with peripheral retinitis and other areas of retinitis were excluded. All patients were treated with ganciclovir. Two distinct types of cytomegalovirus infection of the peripapillary area were identified. Type I was characterized by spread of limited retinitis to the optic disk margin, good central visual acuity, and permanent arcuate and altitudinal visual field defects that enlarged and became more complete as the retinitis progressed toward the disk. Type II appeared to be a true cytomegalovirus infection of the optic nerve characterized by primary, isolated papillitis with peripapillary retinitis, an early afferent pupillary defect, and good initial visual acuity, which rapidly deteriorated despite prompt antiviral therapy. Peripapillary cytomegalovirus retinitis appears to be an important and underreported cause of visual morbidity in patients with AIDS.